Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Cutting Tools Menggunakan Analytic Hierarchy Process (Studi Kasus di Area Prismatic Cell PT XYZ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33197/jlscc.v4i2.3463Kata Kunci:
Analytical Hierarchy Process, Cutting Tools, Evaluasi Kinerja Supplier, Pemilihan Supplier, Supply Chain ManagementAbstrak
Pemilihan supplier merupakan keputusan strategis dalam manajemen supply chain industri manufaktur, khususnya untuk komponen kritis seperti cutting tools yang berpengaruh langsung terhadap kualitas produksi dan efisiensi operasional. PT XYZ menghadapi kebutuhan evaluasi supplier guna mendukung keberlangsungan produksi sesuai standar aerospace AS9100D. Penelitian ini bertujuan menentukan supplier cutting tools terbaik menggunakan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) terhadap lima alternatif supplier dengan kriteria evaluasi meliputi Quality, Cost, Delivery, Flexibility, dan Responsiveness yang diturunkan menjadi 25 sub-kriteria. Data diperoleh melalui kuesioner perbandingan berpasangan dari lima expert divisi procurement, quality control, dan produksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Responsiveness sebagai kriteria berbobot tertinggi (0,3642), diikuti Flexibility (0,2665), Delivery (0,1882), Cost (0,1214), dan Quality (0,0596). Supplier E terpilih sebagai supplier terbaik dengan bobot global 0,2655, diikuti Supplier D (0,2203), Supplier C (0,1919), Supplier B (0,1871), dan Supplier A (0,1353). Seluruh matriks perbandingan berpasangan memiliki Consistency Ratio (CR) < 0,1 yang menunjukkan konsistensi penilaian valid. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan Supplier E sebagai primary supplier dan Supplier D sebagai secondary supplier guna mengurangi ketergantungan pada supplier impor dan meningkatkan efisiensi pengadaan.
Referensi
Alhaqy, L., & Wahyuni, H. C. (2023). Integrasi metode VPI dan AHP untuk pemilihan supplier kayu. Metode: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 9(2), 63–73.
Ambarwati, S., Sukmono, A., & Supardi, A. (2021). Supply chain management: Theory and practice. UMSIDA Press.
Ashfahanni, L. A. P., & Wahyuni, H. C. (2018). Analysis of wood supplier selection using Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process method (AHP). Procedia Engineering and Life Science, 1–11.
Cerezo-Narváez, A., García-Jurado, D., González-Cruz, M. C., Pastor-Fernández, A., Otero-Mateo, M., & Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2019). Standardizing innovation management: An opportunity for SMEs in the aerospace industry. Processes, 7(5), 282.
Ferreira, A. C., & Silva, Â. (2022). Supplier selection and procurement in SMEs: Insights from the literature on key criteria and purchasing strategies. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 14(4), 47–60.
Fountzoula, C., & Aravossis, K. (2021). Analytic hierarchy process and its applications in the public sector: A systematic literature review. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(6), 1–14.
Herdhiansyah, D., Sudarmi, Sakir, Asriani, & La Ode Midi. (2022). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Expert Choice for determining superior plantation commodities: A case in East Kolaka Regency, Indonesia. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST), 44(4), 923–928.
Latif, M. I., & Wahyuning, H. C. (2024). Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in determining the best raw material supplier using Expert Choice software. Procedia of Engineering and Life Science, 7, 628–637.
Lukman. (2021). Supply chain management. CV Cahaya Bintang Cemerlang.
Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2020). Purchasing and supply chain management (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Novi. (2021). Supply chain management: Pengertian, komponen, tujuan, manfaat, prinsip, dan proses. Gramedia Literasi.
Prasetya, A. D., Yuwono, B. D., & Sasmito, C. (2024). Evaluation of occupational safety performance using key performance indicators in manufacturing industrial construction. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan (JSIL), 9(1), 1–14.
Pujawan, I. N., & Er, M. (2017). Supply chain management (3rd ed.). ANDI.
Rasmussen, A., Sabic, H., Saha, S., & Nielsen, I. E. (2023). Supplier selection for aerospace & defense industry through MCDM methods. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 12, 100590.
Sagena, U. (2023). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Dalam Efitra & Sepriano (Eds.), Multi criteria decision making: Teori & penerapan metode pengambilan keputusan dengan MCDM (pp. 43–54). PT Sonpedia.
Sanyoto, G. P., Handayani, R. I., & Widanengsih, E. (2017). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan laptop untuk kebutuhan operasional dengan metode AHP (studi kasus: Direktorat Pembinaan Kursus dan Pelatihan Kemdikbud). Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 13(2), 167–174.
Setiawan, I., & Purba, H. H. (2020). A systematic literature review of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) implementation. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research (JIEMAR), 1(3), 200–208.
Shivajee, V., Singh, R. K., & Rastogi, S. (2019). Manufacturing conversion cost reduction using quality control tools and digitization of real-time data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117678.
Sitanggang, J., Heirunissa, & Ayyuha, N. V. (2024). Pemilihan supplier daging dengan metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) pada Catering Amelia Bekasi. Jurnal GICI: Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis, 16(2), 109–118.
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87.
Torralba-Carnerero, G., García-Nieto, M., Ramón-Jerónimo, J. M., & Flórez-López, R. (2024). Supply chain management control in the aerospace sector: An empirical approach. Logistics, 8(4), 132.
Winoto, E. S., Prihandoko, G., Kusumawardani, N. A., & Qisthani, N. N. (2024). Evaluasi kinerja vendor berdasarkan kriteria Vendor Performance Index (VPI) dengan metode AHP di PT X. In CENTIVE: Conference on Electrical Engineering, Informatics, Industrial Technology, and Creative Media (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 575–586).
Woo, A., Park, B., Sung, H., Yong, H., Chae, J., & Choi, S. (2021). An analysis of the competitive actions of Boeing and Airbus in the aerospace industry based on the competitive dynamics model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 192.
