Analysis of Cutting Tools Supplier Selection Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Case Study in the Prismatic Cell Area of PT XYZ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33197/jlscc.v4i2.3463Keywords:
Analytical Hierarchy Process, Cutting Tools, Supply Chain Management, Supplier Selection, Supplier Performance EvaluationAbstract
Supplier selection is a strategic decision in the supply chain management of the manufacturing industry, especially for critical components such as cutting tools that directly affect production quality and operational efficiency. PT XYZ handles supplier evaluation needs to support production continuity according to the AS9100D aerospace standard. This study aims to determine the best cutting tools supplier using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for five alternative suppliers with evaluation criteria including Quality, Cost, Delivery, Flexibility, and Responsiveness which are broken down into 25 sub-criteria. Data were obtained through paired questionnaires from five divisions of procurement, quality control, and production experts. The results showed Responsiveness as the highest weighted criterion (0.3642), followed by Flexibility (0.2665), Delivery (0.1882), Cost (0.1214), and Quality (0.0596). Supplier E was selected as the best supplier with a global weight of 0.2655, followed by Supplier D (0.2203), Supplier C (0.1919), Supplier B (0.1871), and Supplier A (0.1353). All pairwise comparison matrices have a Consistency Ratio (CR) <0.1, indicating valid assessment consistency. This study recommends Supplier E as the primary supplier and Supplier D as the secondary supplier to reduce dependence on imported suppliers and improve procurement efficiency.
References
Alhaqy, L., & Wahyuni, H. C. (2023). Integrasi metode VPI dan AHP untuk pemilihan supplier kayu. Metode: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 9(2), 63–73.
Ambarwati, S., Sukmono, A., & Supardi, A. (2021). Supply chain management: Theory and practice. UMSIDA Press.
Ashfahanni, L. A. P., & Wahyuni, H. C. (2018). Analysis of wood supplier selection using Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process method (AHP). Procedia Engineering and Life Science, 1–11.
Cerezo-Narváez, A., García-Jurado, D., González-Cruz, M. C., Pastor-Fernández, A., Otero-Mateo, M., & Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2019). Standardizing innovation management: An opportunity for SMEs in the aerospace industry. Processes, 7(5), 282.
Ferreira, A. C., & Silva, Â. (2022). Supplier selection and procurement in SMEs: Insights from the literature on key criteria and purchasing strategies. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 14(4), 47–60.
Fountzoula, C., & Aravossis, K. (2021). Analytic hierarchy process and its applications in the public sector: A systematic literature review. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(6), 1–14.
Herdhiansyah, D., Sudarmi, Sakir, Asriani, & La Ode Midi. (2022). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Expert Choice for determining superior plantation commodities: A case in East Kolaka Regency, Indonesia. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST), 44(4), 923–928.
Latif, M. I., & Wahyuning, H. C. (2024). Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in determining the best raw material supplier using Expert Choice software. Procedia of Engineering and Life Science, 7, 628–637.
Lukman. (2021). Supply chain management. CV Cahaya Bintang Cemerlang.
Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2020). Purchasing and supply chain management (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Novi. (2021). Supply chain management: Pengertian, komponen, tujuan, manfaat, prinsip, dan proses. Gramedia Literasi.
Prasetya, A. D., Yuwono, B. D., & Sasmito, C. (2024). Evaluation of occupational safety performance using key performance indicators in manufacturing industrial construction. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan (JSIL), 9(1), 1–14.
Pujawan, I. N., & Er, M. (2017). Supply chain management (3rd ed.). ANDI.
Rasmussen, A., Sabic, H., Saha, S., & Nielsen, I. E. (2023). Supplier selection for aerospace & defense industry through MCDM methods. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 12, 100590.
Sagena, U. (2023). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Dalam Efitra & Sepriano (Eds.), Multi criteria decision making: Teori & penerapan metode pengambilan keputusan dengan MCDM (pp. 43–54). PT Sonpedia.
Sanyoto, G. P., Handayani, R. I., & Widanengsih, E. (2017). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan laptop untuk kebutuhan operasional dengan metode AHP (studi kasus: Direktorat Pembinaan Kursus dan Pelatihan Kemdikbud). Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 13(2), 167–174.
Setiawan, I., & Purba, H. H. (2020). A systematic literature review of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) implementation. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research (JIEMAR), 1(3), 200–208.
Shivajee, V., Singh, R. K., & Rastogi, S. (2019). Manufacturing conversion cost reduction using quality control tools and digitization of real-time data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117678.
Sitanggang, J., Heirunissa, & Ayyuha, N. V. (2024). Pemilihan supplier daging dengan metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) pada Catering Amelia Bekasi. Jurnal GICI: Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis, 16(2), 109–118.
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87.
Torralba-Carnerero, G., García-Nieto, M., Ramón-Jerónimo, J. M., & Flórez-López, R. (2024). Supply chain management control in the aerospace sector: An empirical approach. Logistics, 8(4), 132.
Winoto, E. S., Prihandoko, G., Kusumawardani, N. A., & Qisthani, N. N. (2024). Evaluasi kinerja vendor berdasarkan kriteria Vendor Performance Index (VPI) dengan metode AHP di PT X. In CENTIVE: Conference on Electrical Engineering, Informatics, Industrial Technology, and Creative Media (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 575–586).
Woo, A., Park, B., Sung, H., Yong, H., Chae, J., & Choi, S. (2021). An analysis of the competitive actions of Boeing and Airbus in the aerospace industry based on the competitive dynamics model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 192.
