Peer Review Process
Focus & Scope
Open Access Statement
Copyright and License
Peer Review Process
The article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process.
Reviewers assess based on the points listed below:
Originality / Idea
At this point, the reviewer assesses the research's authenticity based on the results of previous studies that imply theoretical gaps or phenomena both theoretically and empirically.
Contribution to Existing Knowledge
At this point, reviewers assess that the research conducted by the author can contribute to the field of science worked on by the author.
The reviewer considers that the author's research uses literature following the research title discussed, especially following the literature from previous research, which almost has the same topic title.
Research Design and Method
At this point, the reviewer assesses the extent to research design and methods used in their research follow the aims and objectives of the research.
Writing Style and Clarity
At this point, the reviewer assesses the extent to which the author uses the clarity of the sentences used in his research so that other readers can easily understand his writing.
Reviewers have no conflict of interest in conducting the article review process. Reviewers try to prioritize aspects of objectivity and professionalism following their fields of expertise to produce texts that meet scientific principles.
Reviewers are asked to always be polite and constructive in their report, and never to be abusive or to make unjustified criticisms of the work.
We are committed to ensuring and working to set standards for best practices on ethical matters like plagiarism. Articles that will be published through plagiarism screening to prevent plagiarism by the author. Papers submitted to Journal must be free of plagiarism. Journal will immediately reject papers and remove leading to plagiarism.